Mizuho and the Equator Principles
Mizuho Bank (formerly Mizuho Corporate Bank) recognized early on that the Equator Principles would become a new business standard in international financing for environmental and social risk management of large–scale projects and therefore within six months of their inception in June 2003, Mizuho Bank became the first Asian bank to adopt the Equator Principles in October 2003. Since then, Mizuho Bank has been conducting environmental and social risk assessments based on the Equator Principles, and has also been proactively undertaking initiatives to promote them, and raise awareness regarding environmental and social risk impacts among businesses and other related parties, including the borrowers. Through these activities, Mizuho Bank has contributed to balanced economic development via financing and environmental preservation, and, thus, fulfilled its social responsibility as a financial institution.
Since the adoption of the Equator Principles in October 2003, Mizuho Bank has played a leadership role in the Equator Principles Association as a member of the Steering Committee for many years. Mizuho Bank also led the Equator Principles Association as its Chair for the term May 2014 to May 2015, thus becoming the only Asian bank to chair the association. For the term October 2017 to November 2021, Mizuho Bank held the role of Asia Oceania Regional Representative.
Chronicle: Initiatives for the Equator Principles
| Jun 2003 | Equator Principles were established. |
| Oct 2003 | Mizuho Bank (former Mizuho Corporate Bank) adopted the Equator Principles. |
| Jul 2006 | The Equator Principles were revised, and the second revision of Equator Principles became effective. |
| Nov 2006 | Assumed duties as Secretariat Bank for the Equator Principles Financial Institutions until July 2008. |
| Jun 2007 | Presented with the Chairman's Award of the 2007 Sustainable Banking Awards. |
| Aug 2010 | Assumed the role of the Leader of the Equator Principles Asia Outreach Working Group |
| Jun 2013 | The Equator Principles were revised, and the third revision of Equator Principles became effective. |
| May 2014 | Assumed the role of the Chair Bank of Equator Principles Association until May 2015. |
| Oct 2017 | Assumed the role of the Regional Representative of the Equator Principles in Asia-Oceania region until November 2019. |
| Nov 2019 | Re-elected as the Regional Representative of the Equator Principles in Asia-Oceania region until November 2021 |
| Nov 2019 | The Equator Principles were revised, and the fourth revision of Equator Principles were adopted. |
| Jul 2020 | Started applying the fourth revision of Equator Principles |
| Mar 2021 | Assumed the role of the Lead of the EP4 Reference Working Group until November 2021 |
Implementation System for the Equator Principles
Mizuho Bank has created the Sustainable Development Office in its Sustainable Products Promotion Department. The Sustainable Development Office is responsible for the bank's overall implementation of the Equator Principles.
The Sustainable Development Office applies the Mizuho's in-house Equator Principles Implementation Manual to all its projects globally, which are under the scope of the Equator Principles. The Sustainable Development Office also endeavors to promote internal understanding of the Equator Principles through in–house training and via the distribution of in–house newsletters etc.
General Process for the Equator Principles Implementation [for Project Finance]
Application of the Equator Principles in Loan Syndication
For a project that falls under the scope of the Equator Principles, and in which Mizuho Bank participates in the loan syndication, the business promotion division officer first prepares an "Equator Principles (EP) Screening Form", which is a simplified checklist. The Sustainable Development Office then reviews the EP Screening Form and categorizes the proposed project into A, B or C based on the magnitude of the potential environmental and social impacts. Also, the Sustainable Development Office prepares a recommendation in documents such as "EP Screening Report", to inform the business promotion division officer the necessary actions that the client shall take to comply with the environmental and social requirements. The business promotion division officer then supports the client as recommended by the Sustainable Development Office. In addition, the Sustainable Development Office also ensures that the relevant environmental and social covenants are included in the loan documentation.
Application of the Equator Principles in Project Finance Advisory Services (FA)
For a project in which Mizuho Bank acts as a financial advisor, the Sustainable Development Office supports the clients by advising them on identifying potential issues under environmental and social reviews by Equator Principles Financial Institutions.
Application of the Equator Principles at Each Stage of Project Finance (Image)
Mizuho Bank's Internal Procedures for Equator Principles Implementation [for Project Finance]
- The business promotion division officer prepares an "EP Screening Form", which is a simplified environmental and social risk assessment checklist, and submits it to the Sustainable Development Office.
- The Sustainable Development Office reviews the "EP Screening Form", conducts the required due diligence and categorizes the project into A, B or C.
- The recommendation from the Sustainable Development Office (ex. "EP Screening Report", etc.) is submitted to the credit division together with the credit application prepared by the business promotion division. The credit division takes into account the potential environmental and social risks of the project to make a comprehensive determination of the risks specific to the project.
- After preliminary credit approval, the Sustainable Development Office confirms that the necessary Action Plan is in place and the covenants are set out in relevant financing documents. If additional action is required to make the project compliant with the Equator Principles, the Sustainable Development Office addresses to the Client through the business promotion division to conduct necessary actions.
- After confirming that the necessary steps have been taken by the Client, the business promotion division prepares an "EP Review Form" and submits to the Sustainable Development Office.
- The Sustainable Development Office confirms that the project is compliant with the Equator Principles, and prepares an "EP Review Report".
Internal Equator Principles implementation flow
Disclosure subject to Equator Principles 3 and 4
Closed Transactions screened for EP Compliance
Project Finance
| A | B | C | |
| Definition | Projects with potential significant adverse environmental and social risks and/or impacts that are diverse, irreversible or unprecedented. | Projects with potential limited adverse environmental and social risks and/or impacts that are few in number, generally site–specific, largely reversible and readily addressed through mitigation measures. | Projects with minimal or no adverse environmental and social risks and/or impacts. |
| FY2022 | 10 | 24 | 11 |
| FY2021 | 2 | 19 | 6 |
| FY2020 | 4 | 26 | 10 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles which reached Financial Close (*) in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022.
* The number of projects are counted as follows: i) For projects applying the Equator Principles 3 – on the basis of signing of financing documents; ii) For projects applying the Equator Principles 4 – on the basis of satisfaction of conditions precedent under financing documents. - Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles 3 for projects mandated until June 2020 and the Equator Principles 4 for projects mandated from July 2020.
- The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
By Sector (number of projects)
| Sector | Category | Total | ||
| A | B | C | ||
| Oil/Gas | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 4 | 18 | 1 | 23 |
| Infrastructure | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 |
| Others | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Total | 10 | 24 | 11 | 45 |
| Sector | Category | Total | ||
| A | B | C | ||
| Oil/Gas | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 2 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Infrastructure | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Others | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 2 | 19 | 6 | 27 |
| Sector | Category | Total | ||
| A | B | C | ||
| Oil/Gas | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 2 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
| Infrastructure | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 |
| Others | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 26 | 10 | 40 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles which reached Financial Close (*) in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022.
* The number of projects are counted as follows: i) For projects applying the Equator Principles 3 – on the basis of signing of financing documents; ii) For projects applying the Equator Principles 4 – on the basis of satisfaction of conditions precedent under financing documents. - Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles 3 for projects mandated until June 2020 and the Equator Principles 4 for projects mandated from July 2020.
- The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
By Region, Country (Designated/ Non–designated), and Implementation of Independent Review by an Environmental and Social Consultant (Number of projects)
| Category | Total | |||
| A | B | C | ||
| Americas | 7 | 7 | 2 | 16 |
| Asia Pacific | 1 | 14 | 9 | 24 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 10 | 24 | 11 | 45 |
| Designated Country | 9 | 19 | 11 | 39 |
| Non–Designated Country | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Independent Review Done | 10 | 24 | 1 | 35 |
| Category | Total | |||
| A | B | C | ||
| Americas | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Asia Pacific | 1 | 8 | 6 | 15 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 2 | 19 | 6 | 27 |
| Designated Country | 0 | 18 | 6 | 24 |
| Non–Designated Country | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Independent Review Done | 2 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
| Category | Total | |||
| A | B | C | ||
| Americas | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Asia Pacific | 2 | 2 | 10 | 14 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 2 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Total | 4 | 26 | 10 | 40 |
| Designated Country | 0 | 20 | 10 | 30 |
| Non–Designated Country | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Independent Review Done | 4 | 26 | 1 | 31 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles which reached Financial Close (*) in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022.
* The number of projects are counted as follows: i) For projects applying the Equator Principles 3 – on the basis of signing of financing documents; ii) For projects applying the Equator Principles 4 – on the basis of satisfaction of conditions precedent under financing documents. - Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles 3 for projects mandated until June 2020 and the Equator Principles 4 for projects mandated from July 2020.
- List of Designated Countries as defined by the Equator Principles Association is published on the Equator Principles Association website.
The Equator Principles Association Designated Countries list - The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
Project–Related Corporate Loan
| A | B | C | |
| Definition | Projects with potential significant adverse environmental and social risks and/or impacts that are diverse, irreversible or unprecedented. | Projects with potential limited adverse environmental and social risks and/or impacts that are few in number, generally site–specific, largely reversible and readily addressed through mitigation measures. | Projects with minimal or no adverse environmental and social risks and/or impacts. |
| FY2022 | 0 | 6 | 9 |
| FY2021 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| FY2020 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles which reached Financial Close (*) in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022.
* The number of projects are counted as follows: i) For projects applying the Equator Principles 3 – on the basis of signing of financing documents; ii) For projects applying the Equator Principles 4 – on the basis of satisfaction of conditions precedent under financing documents. - Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles 3 for projects mandated until June 2020 and the Equator Principles 4 for projects mandated from July 2020.
- The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
By Sector (Number of projects)
| Sector | Category | Total | ||
| A | B | C | ||
| Oil/Gas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Infrastructure | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Others | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Total | 0 | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| Sector | Category | Total | ||
| A | B | C | ||
| Oil/Gas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Infrastructure | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Others | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Sector | Category | Total | ||
| A | B | C | ||
| Oil/Gas | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Infrastructure | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Others | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Total | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles which reached Financial Close (*) in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022.
* The number of projects are counted as follows: i) For projects applying the Equator Principles 3 – on the basis of signing of financing documents; ii) For projects applying the Equator Principles 4 – on the basis of satisfaction of conditions precedent under financing documents. - Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles 3 for projects mandated until June 2020 and the Equator Principles 4 for projects mandated from July 2020.
- The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
By Region, Country (Designated/ Non–designated), and Implementation of Independent Review by an Environmental and Social Consultant (Number of projects)
| Category | Total | |||
| A | B | C | ||
| Americas | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Asia Pacific | 0 | 5 | 8 | 13 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| Designated Country | 0 | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Non–Designated Country | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Independent Review Done | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Category | Total | |||
| A | B | C | ||
| Americas | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Asia Pacific | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Designated Country | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Non–Designated Country | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Independent Review Done | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Category | Total | |||
| A | B | C | ||
| Americas | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Asia Pacific | 1 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 |
| Designated Country | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Non–Designated Country | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Independent Review Done | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles which reached Financial Close (*) in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022.
* The number of projects are counted as follows: i) For projects applying the Equator Principles 3 – on the basis of signing of financing documents; ii) For projects applying the Equator Principles 4 – on the basis of satisfaction of conditions precedent under financing documents. - Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles 3 for projects mandated until June 2020 and the Equator Principles 4 for projects mandated from July 2020.
- List of Designated Countries as defined by the Equator Principles Association is published on the Equator Principles Association website.
The Equator Principles Association Designated Countries list - The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
Project-Related Refinance and Project-Related Acquisition Finance
By Sector (Number of projects)
| Sector | Project-Related Refinance |
Project-Related Acquisition Finance |
| Oil/Gas | 0 | 0 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 0 | 0 |
| Infrastructure | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
| Sector | Project-Related Refinance |
Project-Related Acquisition Finance |
| Oil/Gas | 0 | 0 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 0 | 0 |
| Infrastructure | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
| Sector | Project-Related Refinance |
Project-Related Acquisition Finance |
| Oil/Gas | 0 | 0 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 0 | 0 |
| Infrastructure | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles which reached Financial Close (satisfied conditions precedent under financing documents) in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022. However, there were no Project-Related Refinance and Project-Related Acquisition Finance projects to which the Equator Principles 4 were applied during the above reporting period.
- The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
By Region and Country (Designated/ Non–designated) (Number of projects)
| Project-Related Refinance |
Project-Related Acquisition Finance |
|
| Americas | 0 | 0 |
| Asia Pacific | 0 | 0 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
| Designated Country | 0 | 0 |
| Non-Designated Country | 0 | 0 |
| Project-Related Refinance |
Project-Related Acquisition Finance |
|
| Americas | 0 | 0 |
| Asia Pacific | 0 | 0 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
| Designated Country | 0 | 0 |
| Non-Designated Country | 0 | 0 |
| Project-Related Refinance |
Project-Related Acquisition Finance |
|
| Americas | 0 | 0 |
| Asia Pacific | 0 | 0 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
| Designated Country | 0 | 0 |
| Non-Designated Country | 0 | 0 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles which reached Financial Close (satisfied conditions precedent under financing documents) in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022. However, there were no Project-Related Refinance and Project-Related Acquisition Finance projects to which the Equator Principles 4 were applied during the above reporting period.
- List of Designated Countries as defined by the Equator Principles Association is published on the Equator Principles Association website.
The Equator Principles Association Designated Countries list - The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
Project Finance Advisory Services
| Sector | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 |
| Oil/Gas | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mining | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Power | 6 | 5 | 1 |
| Infrastructure | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Others | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 6 | 2 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects for which Mizuho Bank had entered Project Finance Advisory Service contract in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022.
- Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles 3 for projects mandated until June 2020 and the Equator Principles 4 for projects mandated from July 2020.
- The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
| Region | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 |
| Americas | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Asia Pacific | 7 | 6 | 1 |
| Europe/ Middle East/ Africa | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 6 | 2 |
(Note)
- The figures above represent the number of projects for which Mizuho Bank had entered Project Finance Advisory Service contract in FY2020, FY2021 and FY2022.
- Mizuho Bank applied the Equator Principles 3 for projects mandated until June 2020 and the Equator Principles 4 for projects mandated from July 2020.
- The figures above for FY2020 and FY2021 have been assured by KPMG AZSA Sustainability Co., Ltd.
- The figures above for FY2022 have been assured by Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC.
FY2022 Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC Independent Assurance Report (PDF/84KB)
FY2021 KPMG AZSA Sustainability Independent Assurance Report (PDF/1,833KB)
FY2020 KPMG AZSA Sustainability Independent Assurance Report (PDF/1,786KB)
Project Name Reporting Sample - Project Finance
| No. | Project Name (English) | Country |
| 1 | Distribution Centre Project: Northern Chiba Amado-Cho Ⅲ | Japan |
| 2 | Fukaura Wind Farm Project | Japan |
| 3 | Ishikari Offshore Wind Project | Japan |
| 4 | Iwaki Kagurasan Wind Farm Project | Japan |
| 5 | Joso2 | Japan |
| 6 | Kawauchi Onitaroyama Wind Farm Project | Japan |
| 7 | Kitakyushu-Hibikinada Offshore Wind Farm | Japan |
| 8 | SAKAI-KOGA Logistics Project | Japan |
| 9 | Golden Plains Wind Farm | Australia |
| 10 | Goyder South Stage 1 wind farm | Australia |
| 11 | Sydney Metro Western Sydney Airport | Australia |
| 12 | Wellington North and Wunghnu solar projects | Australia |
| 13 | Project One (INEOS Group) | Belgium |
| 14 | Desalination and Water Transmission Project for the National Copper Corporation of Chile | Chile |
| 15 | Eoliennes Flottantes du Golfe du Lion Project | France |
| 16 | Guam Ukudu Project | Guam, US island territory |
| 17 | Gudadur 160MW Blended Wind And Solar Project | India |
| 18 | Round the Clock 400 MW hybrid SECI Project | India |
| 19 | Jeonnam I Offshore Wind Project | Korea |
| 20 | Changhua Plot 3 Floating Solar Project | Taiwan |
| 21 | Changhua Plot 4 Floating Solar Project | Taiwan |
| 22 | Hin Kong Power Project | Thailand |
| 23 | Project Lightning | UAE |
| 24 | Hornsea 2 / Juno Bidco Ltd. | UK |
| 25 | NeuConnect | UK/Germany/Netherlands |
| 26 | AES Clean Energy Warehouse Facility Upsize | USA |
| 27 | Big Plain Solar Project, Oak Trail Solar Project, Horizon Solar Project | USA |
| 28 | Bolt Energy FinanceCo LLC | USA |
| 29 | Champlain Hudson Power Express | USA |
| 30 | Cheniere Corpus Christi Liquefied Natural Gas Project | USA |
| 31 | Golden Triangle Polymers Project | USA |
| 32 | JFK New Terminal One | USA |
| 33 | Matterhorn Express Pipeline | USA |
| 34 | One Java | USA |
| 35 | Port Arthur LNG Phase 1 | USA |
| 36 | Project Whitetails | USA |
| 37 | Venture Global Plaquemines LNG | USA |
| 38 | Venture Global Plaquemines LNG Project | USA |
Project Name Reporting Sample – Project-Related Corporate Loan
| No. | Project Name (English) | Country |
| 1 | Abashiri Biomass Power Project 2/3 | Japan |
| 2 | Fukushima Koriyama Mega Solar Project | Japan |
| 3 | Oyasu Geothermal Katatsumuri Yama Power Plant | Japan |
| 4 | CCGT Project Unit D2 | Hong Kong |
| 5 | Arizona New Plant Project | USA |
Initiatives for the Equator Principles
Leadership as a Member of the Steering Committee
Mizuho Bank was a member of the Equator Principles Association Steering Committee consisting of 10 financial institutions worldwide. During the revision of the Equator Principles in 2013 and 2020, Mizuho Bank took part in various Task Forces such as scope expansion, information disclosure, and climate changes and contributed to finalizing the revised Equator Principles.
Mizuho Bank also participates together with other Equator Principles members in various working groups, such as Biodiversity, Social Risk, Capacity Building & Training, Scope, and Climate Change to help define policies and guidance for the larger group in these important areas of interest. In 2021, we had also assumed the role of the Lead of the EP4 Reference Working Group.
Management and Future Development of the Equator Principles Association
The Equator Principles Association Working Groups
Serving as the Chair Bank (2014 to 2015)
From May 2014, Mizuho Bank assumed the role of the Chair of the Equator Principles Association, and played a leadership role by leading the discussions and decisions affecting the operational policies and organizational management of the Association. At the annual meeting of the Association on October 28, 2014, Mizuho Bank led the other member institutions in discussions regarding climate change, biodiversity, the protection of human rights, capacity building and training among the Association members.
Accepting Trainees
With many years of experience as the Chair and as the Regional Representative of the Equator Principles Association in the Asia-Oceania region, Mizuho Bank has also worked proactively to enhance the understanding of the Equator Principles by accepting trainees from financial institutions in Asia.
- June 2009: China / Industrial Bank Co., Ltd. (First Chinese financial institution to adopt the Equator Principles)
- May 2015: Taiwan / Cathay United Bank Co. (First Taiwanese financial institution to adopt the Equator Principles)
- December 2016, January 2017: Japan / The Norinchukin Bank (Fifth Japanese financial institution to adopt the Equator Principles)
- May 2017: South Korea / Korea Development Bank (First Korean financial institution to adopt the Equator Principles)
- February 2019: Japan / Nippon Life Insurance Company (First Asian insurance company to adopt the Equator Principles)
- August 2019: South Korea / Shinhan Bank (Second Korean financial institution to adopt the Equator Principles)
During the training, the trainees received an opportunity to learn about the implementation of the Equator Principles together with practical case studies.
Publication of a book on "Implementation Guidelines for the Equator Principles"
Mizuho Bank together with MUFG Bank (formerly Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ) and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation published a book on implementation guidelines for the Equator Principles on March 15, 2016. This book not only covers the details of all the ten constituent principles of the Equator Principles framework and their practical implementation by the author banks, but it also provides details on some of the prominent environmental and social risk management guidelines other than the Equator Principles that are commonly referred by the financial institutions. Mizuho Bank believes that the publication of this book will help promote awareness regarding the Equator Principles and other significant environmental and social risk management guidelines and frameworks and will enhance knowledge sharing among the various industries and financial institutions in Japan.
Sustainable Finance Seminar for the Association of Banks in Cambodia
In November 2018, Mizuho Bank held a Sustainable Finance Seminar for the Association of Banks in Cambodia, the National Bank of Cambodia, the Ministry of Environment, private sector banks, and other parties. The goal of the seminar was to introduce Mizuho's progressive initiatives to contribute to the sustainable development of society. Mizuho Bank presented on Mizuho's environmental and social policies and on the Equator Principles, a financial industry benchmark for determining, assessing, and managing environmental and social risk in projects.
Seminar for Japan Society for Impact Assessment (JSIA)
On March 26, 2021, Mizuho Bank organized a seminar about the Equator Principles 4, at the Japan Society for Impact Assessment (JSIA)'s regular meeting.
Seminars held for Stakeholders
Mizuho Bank has been promoting the understanding of the Equator Principles by conducting several outreach events such as holding seminars not only for private financial institutions but also for other stakeholders, including government organizations and private businesses, both in Japan and overseas. More than 310 participants attended such promotional events undertaken by Mizuho Bank in fiscal years from 2018 to 2022.
| Fiscal Year | Country/Region | Participants | Number of Participants |
| FY2018-FY2022 | Japan | Private financial institutions, private businesses, university professors/students | 109 |
| China | Private financial institutions | 40 | |
| Saudi Arabia | Students | 4 | |
| South Korea | Private financial institutions | 3 | |
| China and others (35 countries) | Incorporated administrative agency, international development financial institutions, private financial institutions, financial authorities, university professors/students | 120 | |
| Cambodia | Government, private financial institutions, financial authorities | 15 | |
| Indonesia | Government organizations, Incorporated administrative agency, private financial institutions | 26 |
(Note)
- The number of participants above include approximate numbers.
Internal Training Sessions for Employees
Mizuho Bank conducts regular training sessions for its employees on environmental and social risk assessments and Equator Principles requirements involved in large–scale project financing. In fiscal years from 2018 to 2022, these training sessions were attended by more than 7,350 employees.
| Fiscal Year | Country/Region | Number of Participants |
| 2022 | Japan | 45 |
| 2021 | Japan | 175 |
| Hong Kong | 25 | |
| Singapore | 65 | |
| Australia | 15 | |
| Vietnam | 5 | |
| Thailand | 20 | |
| Indonesia | 20 | |
| USA | 95 | |
| United Kingdom | 85 | |
| UAE | 15 | |
| 2020 | Japan | 3,478 |
| Hong Kong | 253 | |
| Singapore | 583 | |
| Australia | 71 | |
| Vietnam | 92 | |
| Thailand | 144 | |
| Indonesia | 95 | |
| Malaysia | 31 | |
| South Korea | 82 | |
| Myanmar | 21 | |
| USA | 150 | |
| Canada | 28 | |
| United Kingdom | 276 | |
| UAE | 20 | |
| Germany | 64 | |
| Italy | 10 | |
| France | 29 | |
| Netherlands | 16 | |
| Spain | 3 | |
| Belgium | 6 | |
| Russia | 33 | |
| Austria | 4 | |
| Mexico | 11 | |
| Philippines | 22 | |
| Brazil | 33 | |
| India | 170 | |
| Taiwan | 105 | |
| China | 682 | |
| 2019 | Japan | 19 |
| China | 17 | |
| Singapore | 14 | |
| 2018 | Japan | 81 |
| China | 6 | |
| Indonesia | 20 | |
| Singapore | 4 | |
| Thailand | 30 | |
| Vietnam | 15 | |
| USA | 51 | |
| Russia | 20 |
(Note)
- The number of participants above include approximate numbers.